Saturday, August 31, 2024

2009 Bar exam Q & A - Remedial Law

QUESTION:Mariano, through his attorney-in-fact, Marcos, filed with the RTC of Baguio City a complaint for annulment of sale against Henry. Marcos and Henry both reside in Asin Road, Baguio City, while Mariano resides in Davao City. Henry filed a motion to dismiss the complaint on the ground of prematurity for failure to comply with the mandatory barangay conciliation. Resolve the motion with reasons. (2009 BAR EXAMS)



SUGGESTED ANSWER:

The motion to dismiss should be denied because the parties in interest, Mariano and Henry, do not reside in the same city/municipality, or is the property subject of the controversy situated therein. The required conciliation/mediation before the proper Barangay as mandated by the Local Government Code governs only when the parties to the dispute reside in the same city or municipality, and if involving real property, as in this case, the property must be situated also in the same city or municipality.

Get incredible stock video clips and photos from the world's most talented independent creatives. 

Pond5 Artist Page

Please visit my ACCOUNTS: 

No comments:

Post a Comment

  R.A. 9287 Title Six, Crimes Against Public Morals GAMBLING AND LOTTERY A. Introduction The law on gambling exemplifies the adage that what...