Saturday, August 31, 2024

2009 Bar exam Q & A - Remedial Law

QUESTION:Mariano, through his attorney-in-fact, Marcos, filed with the RTC of Baguio City a complaint for annulment of sale against Henry. Marcos and Henry both reside in Asin Road, Baguio City, while Mariano resides in Davao City. Henry filed a motion to dismiss the complaint on the ground of prematurity for failure to comply with the mandatory barangay conciliation. Resolve the motion with reasons. (2009 BAR EXAMS)



SUGGESTED ANSWER:

The motion to dismiss should be denied because the parties in interest, Mariano and Henry, do not reside in the same city/municipality, or is the property subject of the controversy situated therein. The required conciliation/mediation before the proper Barangay as mandated by the Local Government Code governs only when the parties to the dispute reside in the same city or municipality, and if involving real property, as in this case, the property must be situated also in the same city or municipality.

Please visit my ACCOUNTS: 


No comments:

Post a Comment

A Message from the Office of the 2024 Bar Chairperson.

  “So many of our dreams at first seem impossible, then they seem improbable,  and then when we summon the will, they soon become inevitable...